Connect with us

Bad Credit

Grandma Challenges Real Estate Giant In Early Test Of New California Law



Jocelyn Foreman was full of nervous energy and dread.

It was a crisp morning in early March. She arrived at the Pleasant Hill Community Center to find a handful of men and women in a semicircle outside the sandstone-colored building, clutching folders and holding cellphones.

They were there for a foreclosure auction, poised to bid on the house that Foreman rents: a single-story, 1,500-square-foot tract home in Pinole. It’s a simple home — set back from the street — with a steep sloping backyard, worn carpets and a roof that leaks when it rains.

A man with a clipboard started the bidding at $175,000. A woman in a maroon sweatshirt and another man offered competing bids. First $176,000. Then $177,000. Then $180,000.

“They just kept going higher and higher and higher,” Foreman said.

The bidding finally stopped at $600,000. Foreman’s stomach dropped. “And I just thought, ‘Oh my God.’ ”

Foreman had hoped she would be able to buy the house and continue living there thanks to a new state law, signed by Gov. Gavin Newsom last fall, that is designed to prevent pandemic profiteering — and give tenants like her a path to homeownership.

But the law, which allows tenants and nonprofits a 45-day window to match any bid made at a foreclosure auction, provides no money to fund the purchases. So that means Foreman will have to find a way to raise the money herself.

To Foreman, 50, a Black mother of five and grandmother of three, the house in Pinole is much more than a place to rent. She’d been homeless for the better part of the past 20 years, and it was only after she began renting the home in 2018 that she had been able to pay her bills on time and find stability.

“I thought I was breaking the cycle,” she said. “And then I felt like my dreams and my memories were being auctioned away.”

Foreman chased after the woman with the winning bid, to find out who her new landlord would be.

The woman said, “Wedgewood.”

Foreman knew the name. The Redondo Beach real estate firm drew national scrutiny last year after a group of Black homeless mothers occupied a vacant house the company owned in West Oakland. The occupiers, who called themselves Moms 4 Housing, sought to spotlight increasing corporate ownership of housing, which they said had led to rising rents and growing homelessness.

But despite that controversy, and a global pandemic that’s caused mass unemployment, Wedgewood has continued to buy houses.

In fact, a review of public documents by KQED reveals the company went on a spending spree during the pandemic — funneling at least $152.6 million through a network of shell companies to purchase no fewer than 276 properties throughout California. All but 15 of those properties are single-family homes, like Foreman’s three-bedroom house in Pinole.

Some houses have been quickly flipped for a profit. For example, Wedgewood bought a single-story, shell-pink bungalow in North Berkeley last September for $1.15 million and then sold it for $1.71 million in March, after installing new appliances and slapping on a fresh coat of slate-gray paint.

“This is the system we’re up against,” said Steve King, the executive director of the nonprofit Oakland Community Land Trust. “Trying to carve out ways that we can retain some of these properties in the community’s hands, that’s the real challenge.”

Wedgewood declined multiple requests for a phone interview.

“All we know is we bought a house and it is occupied,” company founder and CEO Greg Geiser wrote in an email. Geiser added that he knew someone wanted to match the firm’s offer, but that neither he, nor the company, knew who that was.

Wedgewood’s buying binge continued after the law went into effect in January, KQED found, with the company acquiring at least 102 homes. The properties were purchased across 22 California counties and, in almost every case, the company paid in cash.

That has left Foreman in a race against time. She has until April 18 to match Wedgewood’s bid on the house in Pinole. But the odds are not in her favor. With bad credit and no savings, she doesn’t qualify for a mortgage. Nor would the $2,100 she pays in rent cover the mortgage payments for a $600,000 home.

So, she’s going to need cash — and a lot of it — or she’s afraid she’ll be forced to leave. Foreman reached out to a nonprofit legal aid organization who helped launch an online fundraising effort on her behalf.

The House That Moms Built

When they occupied the house in West Oakland, the women behind Moms 4 Housing argued Wedgewood’s rise was part of a fundamental shift in the housing market marked by a seismic transfer of wealth from individuals to corporations. That shift, they said, began in the wake of the Great Recession, when nearly 10 million people lost their homes through foreclosure.

Kevin Stein, deputy director of the advocacy group California Reinvestment Coalition, said speculators “were the ones that had a lot of cash on hand at the time and who were realizing there was a great opportunity to make a lot of money even as people were suffering.”

After armed sheriffs’ deputies came to evict the moms, Wedgewood agreed to sell the home to the Oakland Community Land Trust, a nonprofit created in the wake of the Great Recession to buy foreclosed homes and keep them permanently affordable. The home will soon become a transitional shelter for homeless mothers.

The controversy also inspired state Sen. Nancy Skinner, a Democrat who represents Oakland, to introduce legislation reforming the foreclosure process so tenants like Foreman would have the opportunity to compete.

“When I introduced and passed SB 1079, my purpose was to give individual homeowners the ability to compete against corporate [purchasers],” Skinner said.

But while the moms won their fight, there’s no guarantee the new law will help Foreman.

Without any funding attached to the law, tenants of foreclosed properties must raise the entire amount themselves, or secure a traditional mortgage — something that can be difficult for someone with bad credit, little savings or who does not have the ability to borrow from friends and family.

Would-be homeowners could also partner with a nonprofit or land trust to buy the home, as the Oakland moms group did with the Oakland Community Land Trust. But Ian Winters, the executive director of the Northern California Community Land Trust, said that even for groups like his, raising the amount needed on short notice is difficult.

“There are very, very, very few housing organizations and very few nonprofit organizations that are sitting on a giant pile of cash that can afford to regularly shell out $600,000 or $700,000 to purchase a property at auction,” he said.

Money aside, Winters said, his organization still wants to help. So the land trust is working to secure financing to buy Foreman’s property and turn it into permanent, affordable housing.

Under this arrangement, Foreman would eventually secure a traditional mortgage to buy the home at an affordable price, but the trust would maintain ownership of the land. This way, if it’s ever sold, it would still be affordable for the next resident.

As of April 5, however, the $14,916 Foreman had raised online was still a far cry from the $250,000 the land trust estimates it needs to keep the $600,000 home affordable for Foreman.

Legacy Lost

Before Foreman moved in, the house in Pinole had been in the same family for more than 30 years. Reginald Mayfield, a longshoreman for 51 years, bought the house in 1984 and spent his retirement years there.

In the few years before his death in 2018, at age 82, he had planned a major rehab of the 1970s home, and took out a loan on the house. It was a project he planned to complete with his daughter, Rochelle Mayfield.

“I spent a lot of time going to stores, just doing a lot of window shopping, with him,” she said. “I would grumble, but it was fun.”

Although she didn’t grow up at the house, Rochelle said it represented one piece of the legacy her grandparents left for her. They moved to the Bay Area from Texas and Louisiana, as part of the Great Migration, when millions of Southern Black families migrated to the North and West in search of better lives.

Mayfield’s grandparents settled in Oakland and Berkeley, picking up war-time jobs and starting their own businesses.

“One thing that both sets of grandparents had in common was that they bought property,” Mayfield said. “And for Black folks at that time to be able to do that, it’s extraordinary.”

In 2018, Foreman and her teenage children were couch surfing — something they had done on and off since 2002 — when she first heard about the Pinole house. A coworker told her that his uncle, Reginald Mayfield, had just passed away.

Foreman at the time had two jobs. The first was at the Berkeley Unified School District, connecting families in need with food, employment or housing resources. She was also moonlighting as an in-home caregiver.

But she still couldn’t find a place to live that would accommodate her teenage children and didn’t require a brutal commute to her job and to her kids’ school in Berkeley.

When she heard about the vacant home, she contacted Rochelle Mayfield, who was sympathetic to Foreman’s plight and agreed to rent to her.

“I took a chance on her,” Mayfield said, “when she needed someone to take a chance on her.”

Foreman met Mayfield in Oct. 2018 in the parking lot of a Whole Foods to hand over the deposit. Foreman’s car payment was due the same day, so she had to choose: give up her car or put the deposit down?

She handed over the check, and then, after Mayfield left, opened the trunk of her car. There, in neat stacks, were all of her belongings. She took a picture.

“Because in my mind,” Foreman said, “this was going to be the last time I was doing this.”

And Foreman said she hasn’t looked back: “I’ve been on my feet ever since.”

That is, until she got a notice, in February 2020, posted on the front door of her home, saying the house would be sold at a foreclosure auction the following month. Mayfield had been having a hard time making the mortgage payments on both the Pinole home and a house in Richmond she inherited from her mother, where she also lives.

Because of the pandemic, the house in Pinole didn’t actually sell until March, 2021, when Wedgewood made the winning bid.

The company declined to answer questions about whether it intends to resell Foreman’s house or rent it out. California law prevents evictions for nonpayment of rent during the pandemic, but it won’t protect Foreman if Wedgewood decides to sell the property.

A spokesperson for the company said that, in general, Wedgewood sells the homes it buys.

“We’re a real estate company that buys distressed housing and then heavily invests in renovating and restoring the homes as needed,” Wedgewood said in an emailed statement. “We then sell, in partnership with agents throughout the state, to new homeowners, the majority of which are owner-occupants, who have a vested interest in their home and community.”

Driving Up Prices

On its website, Wedgewood describes itself as a “leading acquirer of distressed residential real estate.” The company was founded in 1985 by Geiser with a fix-and-flip business model of buying up cheap foreclosed homes and selling them for a profit.

At a Florida real estate conference in 2015, Geiser called house flipping “hot and sexy” and claimed his company had bought and sold 3,000 homes in the past year, averaging about 250 foreclosure home purchases a month.

“Every day we cover every foreclosure sale from Denver to Seattle up through Idaho down to San Diego,” he told the crowd.

Even so, Geiser bristles at the suggestion that his firm is driving up housing prices by flipping property: “That view is just plain inaccurate,” he said in an email.

Among the houses the company has bought in the last year is a 1912 Victorian on a quiet residential street in North Oakland. Like the house in Pinole, the previous owners’ heirs lost it to the bank after the homeowner passed away.

Wedgewood repainted the tan and brown house in sage green with a golden yellow trim and installed new appliances. But when the new homeowners moved in, they discovered a host of other problems.

One of the homeowners, who declined to give her name, said new lighting fixtures had been installed incorrectly and had to be reinstalled. The electrical wiring had to be updated so the house was safe to inhabit. The chimney was caving in and had to be removed. And the foundation also needed work.

As of April 2, public records linked Wedgewood to at least 143 properties it has purchased in the Bay Area and 719 across the state, the majority of which are single-family homes. The homes are, on average, about 60 years old, and often located in more affordable cities or more affordable neighborhoods, including many communities of color, where residents have seen rents and home prices grow astronomically in recent years.

The company operates using an extensive network of shell companies, including Catamount Properties 2018, LLC, which flipped the North Oakland property. It’s one of at least 40 active entities in California controlled by Wedgewood, according to the California Secretary of State’s Office.

At a recent foreclosure auction in Oakland, a woman in sneakers and a gray sweatshirt represented the company. She bid aggressively on a single-family home in Castro Valley. It ultimately sold to another bidder for $661,100.

While some bidders shook their heads at the eye-popping price, others, like Robert Kramer, a veteran at foreclosure sales, said it doesn’t matter.

“The market (for single-family homes) is going up,” Kramer said. “By the time you get them fixed up and back on the market, there’s typically a pretty healthy profit there — 20% or more.”

The foreclosure rate in California is significantly down from its peak in 2010, and has even declined during the pandemic, largely because of a federal moratorium on foreclosures for federally-backed mortgages.

And Kramer said that means bidders are pushing the prices for foreclosed homes even higher, which makes it difficult for would-be homeowners like Foreman, as well as nonprofit affordable housing providers and community land trusts, to match the winning bid.

“The way foreclosure auctions are structured in California, it’s like the Wild Wild West,” said King, of the Oakland Community Land Trust. “The system is plainly not set up for those properties to be transitioned to some community use.”

A Plea for Funding

Winters, of the Northern California Community Land Trust, says that in order for Skinner’s SB 1079 to be effective, there needs to be funding. Most properties that go to foreclosure have deferred maintenance issues that need to be resolved to ensure the house continues to be livable, not to mention the accumulated cost of unpaid taxes and other fees.

And there needs to be a subsidy, he says, to ensure that those homes are affordable to would-be homeowners, like Foreman.

“There does need to be a revolving pool of money that helps the nonprofit housing sector acquire the property, stabilize it, get it back into use,” he said.

California’s network of community land trusts is lobbying the Legislature for dedicated funding to implement SB 1079 over the next five years. And Sen. Skinner is hoping to create a fund to enable those purchases through this year’s budget process.

Without a subsidy from the state, Winters is relying on the community to come together to fundraise for a subsidy for Foreman’s house, which will ensure it can remain affordable. And even though the land trust has agreed to help Foreman, it hasn’t secured the loan yet.

While those details are being worked out, Foreman is guardedly optimistic. She doesn’t like thinking about where she and her family will go if they can’t raise the money.

“I’ve said repeatedly to myself, ‘I’m not going anywhere,’” she said. “My grandson is not sleeping on somebody’s floor. That’s not going to happen.”


San Diego News Now podcast branding

San Diego news; when you want it, where you want it. Get local stories on politics, education, health, environment, the border and more. New episodes are ready weekday mornings. Hosted by Anica Colbert and produced by KPBS, San Diego and the Imperial County’s NPR and PBS station.

Curious San Diego banner

To view PDF documents, Download Acrobat Reader.

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Bad Credit

Cleaning up your credit safely



TUCSON, Az. (KGUN) — Americans who are dealing with financial hardship because of job loss and aftermath caused by the pandemic could be struggling to make ends meat and in some cases they might be racking up credit card debt or they’re simply late on paying bills.

KGUN 9 caught up with Sean Herdrick with the Better Business Bureau of Southern Arizona who says there are ways to get your credit fixed but you have to be careful about who’s handling your situation because they can take your money and leave you with bad credit.

“To see how many 1-star ratings there are for credit companies is frightening. They promise you they will do all of this stuff for your credit, get things taken off. Negotiate with your creditors. They’ll ask for a fee up front, you send them the fee and they never come back to you,” Herdrick said.

According to the BBB you can check their website to find out details about how a company operates. And while there are three common ways to fix your credit. It’s also a good idea to get schooled on extra fees.

“We vet the companies we accredit and if you find an accredited credit business chances are they’re doing a good job and they’re going to help you out. Credit counseling and that’s probably the best way. There’s also debt relief or settlement companies where they offer to settle your debts for you or come up with a plan to do that and a debt consolidation company they will offer a loan at a lower interest rate to help pay off all of your debts at once,” Herdrick said.

The U.S Department of Commerce released data that says Americans are spending their stimulus checks on clothing and sporting goods while others are using it for bills to fend off financial ruin and get their credit back on track.

“Do your research make sure the company you hire can give you what you need,” Herdrick said.

BBB Tip links:

Consumer Financial Protection Bureau:

Source link

Continue Reading

Bad Credit

Taking A Joint Home Loan Can Benefit You. Here’s Why – Forbes Advisor INDIA



In India, buying a home is mostly the single largest investment made by an individual during their lifetime. As our families expand, we plan for the future and plan to invest in bigger homes that can comfortably accommodate and protect a growing family. However, such dream houses come at a significant cost, warrant access to huge funds, and hence, require key financial planning.

In most cases, individuals need to opt for home loans to fulfil the cost obligation associated with buying a house. Considering the amount and type of loan taken, there are certain eligibility criteria that one needs to be aware of before initiating applications. 

At the time of taking a home loan, your lender or you may wish to add another applicant, also called co-applicant, to your home loans for various reasons and the structure of having a co-applicant is referred to as a joint home loan. 

Let’s understand when and why should you take a joint home loan. 

Role of a Co-applicant in a Joint Home Loan

A lender while considering applications simply wants to check if the borrower can repay the home loan along with their household expenses and existing loans. Therefore, while calculating your eligibility they generally keep aside a certain fixed portion of your income that covers your existing expenses. An individual’s eligibility is decided on the basis of the discretionary amount left post calculating their interest repayments and monthly instalments. 

In a joint home loan, you can add another co-applicant or applicants who becomes liable to pay the home loan along with the primary applicant. Liability of the loan is a collective responsibility on both or all the co-applicants as well. Generally, immediate family members, including father, mother, spouse, children, and brother, are most eligible to become co-applicants in joint home loans. 

With such arrangements the question that mostly arises is whether the co-applicant is also the co-owner of the home being considered. Co-applicant or co-applicants may or may not be the co-owner of the property, however they have a liability to pay back the loan. The co-owner of the property is a joint owner along with other owners. 

As a safeguard and prudent underwriting practice, lenders ask all co-owners to also become co-applicants in home loans, however, the reverse need not be true. This is a decision the pros and cons of which should be carefully considered by the primary applicant while choosing joint home loans.

Why Choose a Joint Home Loan Over Any Other Loan 

There are a number of additional advantages in considering taking a joint home loan as compared to an individual home loan. These include higher loan amount eligibility, lower interest rates and other income tax benefits. 

Higher Loan Amount Eligibility: When you add an income-earning co-applicant to a loan, the lender considers the income level of all the applicants and calculates an eligibility amount higher than that of only one individual applying for a home loan. This allows applicants or families to take a larger home loan amount or purchase a more aspirational home since the room for increasing an applicant budget is possible. 

Lower Interest Rates: In order to avail lower interest rates individuals can add their spouses or mother as co-applicants for a joint home loan and as a joint property owner. This is useful as most lenders in India offer a lower rate of interest to women borrowers. It is up to 10 to 25 basis points lower than the interest rate for male borrowers. 

Tax Benefits: Tax benefits can be enjoyed by all the co-applicants separately. For this to happen, co-applicants should be property owners as well and should contribute to the payment of monthly instalments towards the repayment of the home loan. 

Income Tax benefits that are available to the all co-applicants include: 

  • Benefit under Section 80 C of the Income-Tax Act for the loan’s principal payment up to a maximum limit of INR 1.50 lakh per year. 
  • Benefits under Section 24 of the Income-Tax Act for interest paid on a home loan up to INR 2 lakh per year. 
  • In a joint home loan, both the applicants can claim the above amounts individually and use this as an effective tax planning tool

Co-applicants and first-time loan applicants can utilise the joint home loan as a great tool to improve their credit score, thereby easing the process for future loan applications as and when required for various other purposes. 

Necessary Documents Needed for a Joint Home Loan

Documentation is the most cumbersome and tiring part of taking any loan. However, it is a critical part of any lender’s operations as they would want to make sure that their borrower meets income eligibility and supporting documents are provided. 

There are a number of regulatory guidelines for the know your customer (KYC) and property-related documents, where it is imperative that all accurate documentation is shared to avoid unnecessary rejections and thereby delaying the availability of funds. 

For any home loan, typically an applicant needs to provide the following: –

  • KYC documents which include:
    • Identity Proof
    • Address Proof 
  • Income proof documents including but not limited to:
    • Salary slips, Form 16 issued by your employer or
    • Income tax returns (especially for self-employed) of the last three years
  • Property related documents such as: 
    • Agreement to sell, a sale deed or a registry 
    • Previous sale deed for the property (typically all transactions done on that property in the last 13 years) 
    • Few property or location-specific documents like a no-objection certificate (NOC) from relevant authorities or from your bank if the project is funded by any financer in case you are buying new property from a builder.

All applicants need to provide their KYC documents regardless of whether they earn an income or not or whether they even co-own the property. 

If you are applying for a joint home loan mainly for higher eligibility wherein the income of other applicants also needs to be considered, then income documents of all the applicants will be required to be shared with the lender in addition to KYC documents.  

If your purpose is to save on stamp duty charges by adding a female member of the house as a co-owner of the property, then you must make sure that the draft agreements and final sale deed or the registry documents have relevant members stated clearly as co-owners. 

If you are a nonresident Indian (NRI), you can issue a registered power of attorney (POA) in favour of a trusted family member for them to execute the necessary documentation on your behalf. However, you must ensure that the exact purpose of the required transactions are mentioned in the POA, thereby easing the process for compliance and reducing chances of rejection.

Factors to Consider Before Applying for a Loan

Before even applying for a joint loan, it is important to fully understand the lenders’ conditions, which differ depending on the provider you’re considering to approach. 

Lending Conditions

  • If the property has co-owners, in such a case, the lender, in all likelihood, insists all co-owners to become co-applicants as well. 
  • The lender may also insist any or one of your family members become co-applicants in the case of an NRI loan. 
  • If you have given the power of attorney to any of your family members, the lender is likely to insist one of the family members is available in the country as co-applicant for follow-ups and communication purposes to minimize repayment risks.

Credit Score Reports

It is always better to check your and the other co-applicant’s credit score and bureau report prior to applying. This will help to ensure that you are aware of all your past and current loans along with their performance over time. 

In some cases, if it is observed that you may have an old credit card with some minor payment overdue or incorrect reporting by any financial institution, it may lead to the possibility of hampering your overall credit score, reducing the chances of approval.

In India, there are primarily four credit bureaus via which you can check your credit report. Any bureau after paying relevant fees, which is about INR 500, will process your credit report. These credit bureaus include CIBIL, Equifax, CRIF Highmark and Experian.  

When to Avoid Taking a Joint Home Loan?

When a co-applicant already has significant loan obligations and is not left with sufficient income to be eligible for a higher home loan amount, it is generally advisable to reconsider taking a joint home loan and instead consider an individual home loan.

Healthy credit history is very important for lenders while considering applications and a co-applicant who has a bad credit history or poor track of repaying past loans is a major factor while assessing the eligibility of a new loan. 

If your income is sufficient to cover costs with no additional benefits available in terms of tax write-offs, it is suitable for you to avoid a joint home loan and keep the responsibility of your liability limited.

Joint home loans are also best avoided if there is a plan for taking on a larger liability or loan in the near future as the joint loan may impact the eligibility criteria of future loans due to existing liabilities.

Bottom Line

A joint home loan is a beneficial financial tool with the potential of helping the borrower secure higher loan amounts. 

It can aid individuals significantly improve their spending power and investing threshold while buying a larger and more comfortable home and at the same time keeping the primary applicant’s liabilities manageable by sharing the repayment burden with other co-applicants. 

If utilized correctly, it can help you enjoy higher tax benefits, while simultaneously reducing overall tax outgo on a yearly-basis. 

Source link

Continue Reading

Bad Credit

Fixed-rate student loan refinancing rates inch up, but still hover near record low



Our goal here at Credible Operations, Inc., NMLS Number 1681276, referred to as “Credible” below, is to give you the tools and confidence you need to improve your finances. Although we do promote products from our partner lenders who compensate us for our services, all opinions are our own.

The latest trends in interest rates for student loan refinancing from the Credible marketplace, updated weekly.  (iStock)

Rates for well-qualified borrowers using the Credible marketplace to refinance student loans into 10-year fixed-rate loans hit another low during the week of April 12, 2021.

For borrowers with credit scores of 720 or higher who used the Credible marketplace to select a lender, during the week of April 12:

  • Rates on 10-year fixed-rate loans averaged 3.78%, up from 3.73% the week before and down from 4.81% a year ago. The record low for 10-year fixed rate loans was 3.71%, during the week of Feb. 15, 2021.
  • Rates on 5-year variable-rate loans averaged 3.26%, up slightly from 3.13% the week before and down from 3.28% a year ago. Variable-rate loans recorded a record low of 2.63% during the week of June 29, 2020.

Student loan refinancing weekly rate trends

If you’re curious about what kind of student loan refinance rates you may qualify for, you can use an online tool like Credible to compare options from different private lenders. Checking your rates won’t affect your credit score.

Current student loan refinancing rates by FICO score

To provide relief from the economic impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, interest and payments on federal student loans have been suspended through at least Sept. 30, 2021. As long as that relief is in place, there’s little incentive to refinance federal student loans. But many borrowers with private student loans are taking advantage of the low interest rate environment to refinance their education debt at lower rates.

If you qualify to refinance your student loans, the interest rate you may be offered can depend on factors like your FICO score, the type of loan you’re seeking (fixed or variable rate), and the loan repayment term. 

The chart above shows that good credit can help you get a lower rate, and that rates tend to be higher on loans with fixed interest rates and longer repayment terms. Because each lender has its own method of evaluating borrowers, it’s a good idea to request rates from multiple lenders so you can compare your options. A student loan refinancing calculator can help you estimate how much you might save. 

If you want to refinance with bad credit, you may need to apply with a cosigner. Or, you can work on improving your credit before applying. Many lenders will allow children to refinance parent PLUS loans in their own name after graduation.

You can use Credible to compare rates from multiple private lenders at once without affecting your credit score.

How rates for student loan refinancing are determined

The rates private lenders charge to refinance student loans depend in part on the economy and interest rate environment, but also the loan term, the type of loan (fixed- or variable-rate), the borrower’s credit worthiness, and the lender’s operating costs and profit margin. 

About Credible

Credible is a multi-lender marketplace that empowers consumers to discover financial products that are the best fit for their unique circumstances. Credible’s integrations with leading lenders and credit bureaus allow consumers to quickly compare accurate, personalized loan options ― without putting their personal information at risk or affecting their credit score. The Credible marketplace provides an unrivaled customer experience, as reflected by over 4,300 positive Trustpilot reviews and a TrustScore of 4.7/5.

Source link

Continue Reading